Modi is engineering Muslim Exodus! Mustafa Khan k and patch up work. People not only killed and burnt houses but left not a single brick of home and hope of returning and rebuilding. 2. Call it by any name or no name India was India and lived in harmony for thousands of years neighbor by neighbor in rich diversity. 3. Assam developed because of the need of work done by migrants from parts of India. 4. Gujarat saw rioting on account of quota reservation and cow slaughter and the riots were turned against the minority Muslim at the receiving end. What happened in 2002 was planned genocide. 5. Temples and mosques have been destroyed and no one can be immaculate in record nor can anyone community held responsible. 6. Opening of the temple door or raising of the mosque to the ground is the result of selfish calculation of parties. This is not India. 7. The exodus of Kashmiri pandit was made possible by governor Jagmohan by luring most of them with money and housing. 8. The shooting at Ayodhya was in reaction to marauding crowd of kar sevaks. Muslims were not in sight anywhere. Not even the whole of Ayodhya. 9. The victims were overwhelmingly Muslim minority who suffered hugely and the blasts in 1993 was revenge of some gangsters because of their family members being raped and killed in tit for tat where police were on the wrong side. 10. Godhra was truly a tragedy but two commissions of the governments have very widely different conclusions. 11. The Mopla rebellion of 1921 transpired due to the British troops of native origin who entered the famous mosque at Tirurangdi and killed large number of Kerala Muslims. There is no communalism. But it became a part of khilafat. 12. The train blast of 2006 has been solved and only people of Indian origin were sentenced to imprisonment and no foreigner was involved. 13. Temple desecration not solved. 14. Muslim/Hindu migration to Assam and other regions is a matter of people of Indian origin seeking work. 15. What foreign agencies record doesn’t tally the right figures. 16. Border regions are tightly controlled being so porous. 17. Muslims in India formally and informally have been using sharia courts existing at different levels and places. 18. Safety is a matter of disciplined patrolling and registering cross border crimes and population shift. Though the petition was rejected with a frown it has come at a time when there is growing intolerance in the country and simultaneous weltanschauung of exodus through creation of low key communal tension with frequent, small, low-intensity incidents out of petty everyday issues that institutionalise communalism at the grass roots. [2] . A part of the need to respond is that there are leaders who have had the misfortune to fall a prey to the theory of Samuel Huntington that there is a clash. This: on the account that the Muslims don’t live with their neghbours in peace. In fact the opposite is the case now. Former PM AB Vajpayee travelled to Goa in 2002 where he wanted to change the leadership in Gujarat because of the pogroms of Muslims. But the restive audience was adamant and forced him not to change the leadership of Modi. The petition of Sangat Singh Chauhan brings back what the Hindutva right wing groups still cherish. Hence it is imperative to oppose it by all means in all fields. There is commensalism in the working of different schemes and programmes that Modi has initiated like multiplying watchmen all over the country. One such is "Main Bhi Chowkidar" Fatima Nafees. Her son -- Najeeb Ahmed -- disappeared under mysterious circumstances from his hostel room in the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) three years ago. Three agencies made inquiry but failed to unearth any result. "If you are a chowkidar, then tell me where is my son Najeeb? Why ABVP goons not arrested? Why three top agencies failed to find my son?" she questioned in a tweet, along with a hashtag that read #WhereIsNajeeb. Another matter is that of Swami Asimanand. The case of attack on Samjhauta express was investigated by the Haryana police who uncovered many involved in that attack of February 18, 2007 and the same were behind the Malegaon bomb blasts of September 8, 2006. Then how come the results of Haryana police findings not shared by other investigations made by NIA and even the confession of Asimanand under section 186? Why is the PM so insouciant in these matters? This casual indifference of Narendra Modi contrasts with his carefully choosing judges to bring one who would acquit Babu Bajrangi in the earlier days when he was absconding in Gujarat state guest house at Mr Abu. Under his watch of his state all the 20 or more fake encounters took place he carefully made speeches to garner votes and win election and also saw that the cases include his own minister Haren Pandya’s conspiratorial murder ended up in suborning of justice. Modi’s silence is deafening as events are multiplying with ominous implications. Why was 50 Kgs of RDX taken to Pulwama? Why did he remain silent over the Haryana attack on a Muslim family? Why did the attackers ask the family to leave India and play cricket in Pakistan despite a tricolor fluttering atop the house. This would only confirm the belief that the PM does not want Muslims to live in India, but go to Pakistan. The jaw of the shark of RSS is opening widely! All this reminds of how Hemant Karkare, who briefly headed Anti Terrorism Squad of Maharashtra and was killed for his honesty. Since then there is a shift that only Muslims must be arrested and Hindus cannot be terrorists. As Arun Jaitly says, with hindsight on Upwama, that the last nail in the coffin of Hindutva terrorism is stuck in. How can that be! Playing politics on the issue of terrorism is the oxygen. The aim is forced exodus of Muslims of India. Among discoveries of Karkare was the geo-political strategic implication of a group[Abhinav Bharat] that was hell bent to have realignment of strategic diplomatic and far reaching relationships with external and internal groups and forces. In foreign diplomatic and strategic relations the group had already secured a representation of the Israelis who had attended a conspiracy meeting within the jurisdiction of India without the knowledge of the central government or the foreign office. Their meeting was aimed to plan and cause sabotage within India for which the group within India was seeking steady supply of explosives, arms and ammunition. It wanted safe haven for refuge for the group members if the government in Delhi chose to crack upon the group. As if that were not enough the group within the country wanted its designed saffron flag to fly over its diplomatic centre in Tel Aviv. Sudhakar Dwedi: I told you on that day. Two Israelis had come to meet me. They sat here. And we talked something here. They are going to give us whatever is first cooperation (we seek). Purohit: They have already given us. They have demanded everything on the net and by fax. They have created an email ID. We cannot access it. They get it from us in draft in a box. They know the pass word for it and we do not know it. They use the pass word and open and see it. OK NOT OK NOT ACCEPTED they say only. This brief conversation between the two members of Abhinav Bharat indicates the depth of involvement. The Israelis had already paid a secret visit and wanted two instances of work done within the country by the Abhinav Bharat as surety for extending help clandestinely to the Hindutva organization. The two instances could very well be the first Malegaon attack on September 8, 2006 and February18, 2007 attack on Samjhauta Express . The next and more important is that the Israelis are cleverer than the desi chankyas for they do not want any trail left that leads to them. For example India being a democratic country may seek explanation from Israel so there should be no proof that would point an accusing finger at them. If the Abhinav Bharat or RSS members were caught by Indian police they should not spill the beans that would embarrass the Israelis. [1]https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/najeeb-ahmeds-mother-takes-on-pm-modi-campaign-chowkidar-wheres-my-son-2008914 . [2] Sudha Pai and Sajjan Kumar. Everyday Communalism: Riots in Contemporary Uttar Pradesh (OUP, 2018).

Modi is engineering Muslim Exodus! Law is law and it doesn’t differentiate whether you have 56 inch chest or pay 56 kinds of taxes to be heard in the court. That Muslims of India should be sent to Pakistan is asking for the impossible. That is what a petitioner wanted and Justice Rohinton Nariman of Delhi High Court did on March 15 2019. no one leaves home unless home is the mouth of a shark. you only run for the border when you see the whole city running as well Warson Shire, “Home” Why does the problem/matter of the India’s Muslim minority crop up again and over again. One thing that is bright and clear, Muslims of India live well wherever they are in South, North, West, East, etc. But there are people who make their otherness insufferable. One such was a petitioner to Delhi High Court who wanted that all the Muslims of India should be deported to Pakistan. He gave 18 reasons for this. The judge rejected the petition which contains 18reasons of sorts. They stand countered: 1. The two-nation theory was the failure of talk and patch up work. People not only killed and burnt houses but left not a single brick of home and hope of returning and rebuilding. 2. Call it by any name or no name India was India and lived in harmony for thousands of years neighbor by neighbor in rich diversity. 3. Assam developed because of the need of work done by migrants from parts of India. 4. Gujarat saw rioting on account of quota reservation and cow slaughter and the riots were turned against the minority Muslim at the receiving end. What happened in 2002 was planned genocide. 5. Temples and mosques have been destroyed and no one can be immaculate in record nor can anyone community held responsible. 6. Opening of the temple door or raising of the mosque to the ground is the result of selfish calculation of parties. This is not India. 7. The exodus of Kashmiri pandit was made possible by governor Jagmohan by luring most of them with money and housing. 8. The shooting at Ayodhya was in reaction to marauding crowd of kar sevaks. Muslims were not in sight anywhere. Not even the whole of Ayodhya. 9. The victims were overwhelmingly Muslim minority who suffered hugely and the blasts in 1993 was revenge of some gangsters because of their family members being raped and killed in tit for tat where police were on the wrong side. 10. Godhra was truly a tragedy but two commissions of the governments have very widely different conclusions. 11. The Mopla rebellion of 1921 transpired due to the British troops of native origin who entered the famous mosque at Tirurangdi and killed large number of Kerala Muslims. There is no communalism. But it became a part of khilafat. 12. The train blast of 2006 has been solved and only people of Indian origin were sentenced to imprisonment and no foreigner was involved. 13. Temple desecration not solved. 14. Muslim/Hindu migration to Assam and other regions is a matter of people of Indian origin seeking work. 15. What foreign agencies record doesn’t tally the right figures. 16. Border regions are tightly controlled being so porous. 17. Muslims in India formally and informally have been using sharia courts existing at different levels and places. 18. Safety is a matter of disciplined patrolling and registering cross border crimes and population shift. Though the petition was rejected with a frown it has come at a time when there is growing intolerance in the country and simultaneous weltanschauung of exodus through creation of low key communal tension with frequent, small, low-intensity incidents out of petty everyday issues that institutionalise communalism at the grass roots. [2] . A part of the need to respond is that there are leaders who have had the misfortune to fall a prey to the theory of Samuel Huntington that there is a clash. This: on the account that the Muslims don’t live with their neghbours in peace. In fact the opposite is the case now. Former PM AB Vajpayee travelled to Goa in 2002 where he wanted to change the leadership in Gujarat because of the pogroms of Muslims. But the restive audience was adamant and forced him not to change the leadership of Modi. The petition of Sangat Singh Chauhan brings back what the Hindutva right wing groups still cherish. Hence it is imperative to oppose it by all means in all fields. There is commensalism in the working of different schemes and programmes that Modi has initiated like multiplying watchmen all over the country. One such is "Main Bhi Chowkidar" Fatima Nafees. Her son -- Najeeb Ahmed -- disappeared under mysterious circumstances from his hostel room in the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) three years ago. Three agencies made inquiry but failed to unearth any result. "If you are a chowkidar, then tell me where is my son Najeeb? Why ABVP goons not arrested? Why three top agencies failed to find my son?" she questioned in a tweet, along with a hashtag that read #WhereIsNajeeb. Another matter is that of Swami Asimanand. The case of attack on Samjhauta express was investigated by the Haryana police who uncovered many involved in that attack of February 18, 2007 and the same were behind the Malegaon bomb blasts of September 8, 2006. Then how come the results of Haryana police findings not shared by other investigations made by NIA and even the confession of Asimanand under section 186? Why is the PM so insouciant in these matters? This casual indifference of Narendra Modi contrasts with his carefully choosing judges to bring one who would acquit Babu Bajrangi in the earlier days when he was absconding in Gujarat state guest house at Mr Abu. Under his watch of his state all the 20 or more fake encounters took place he carefully made speeches to garner votes and win election and also saw that the cases include his own minister Haren Pandya’s conspiratorial murder ended up in suborning of justice. Modi’s silence is deafening as events are multiplying with ominous implications. Why was 50 Kgs of RDX taken to Pulwama? Why did he remain silent over the Haryana attack on a Muslim family? Why did the attackers ask the family to leave India and play cricket in Pakistan despite a tricolor fluttering atop the house. This would only confirm the belief that the PM does not want Muslims to live in India, but go to Pakistan. The jaw of the shark of RSS is opening widely! All this reminds of how Hemant Karkare, who briefly headed Anti Terrorism Squad of Maharashtra and was killed for his honesty. Since then there is a shift that only Muslims must be arrested and Hindus cannot be terrorists. As Arun Jaitly says, with hindsight on Upwama, that the last nail in the coffin of Hindutva terrorism is stuck in. How can that be! Playing politics on the issue of terrorism is the oxygen. The aim is forced exodus of Muslims of India. Among discoveries of Karkare was the geo-political strategic implication of a group[Abhinav Bharat] that was hell bent to have realignment of strategic diplomatic and far reaching relationships with external and internal groups and forces. In foreign diplomatic and strategic relations the group had already secured a representation of the Israelis who had attended a conspiracy meeting within the jurisdiction of India without the knowledge of the central government or the foreign office. Their meeting was aimed to plan and cause sabotage within India for which the group within India was seeking steady supply of explosives, arms and ammunition. It wanted safe haven for refuge for the group members if the government in Delhi chose to crack upon the group. As if that were not enough the group within the country wanted its designed saffron flag to fly over its diplomatic centre in Tel Aviv. Sudhakar Dwedi: I told you on that day. Two Israelis had come to meet me. They sat here. And we talked something here. They are going to give us whatever is first cooperation (we seek). Purohit: They have already given us. They have demanded everything on the net and by fax. They have created an email ID. We cannot access it. They get it from us in draft in a box. They know the pass word for it and we do not know it. They use the pass word and open and see it. OK NOT OK NOT ACCEPTED they say only. This brief conversation between the two members of Abhinav Bharat indicates the depth of involvement. The Israelis had already paid a secret visit and wanted two instances of work done within the country by the Abhinav Bharat as surety for extending help clandestinely to the Hindutva organization. The two instances could very well be the first Malegaon attack on September 8, 2006 and February18, 2007 attack on Samjhauta Express . The next and more important is that the Israelis are cleverer than the desi chankyas for they do not want any trail left that leads to them. For example India being a democratic country may seek explanation from Israel so there should be no proof that would point an accusing finger at them. If the Abhinav Bharat or RSS members were caught by Indian police they should not spill the beans that would embarrass the Israelis. [1]https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/najeeb-ahmeds-mother-takes-on-pm-modi-campaign-chowkidar-wheres-my-son-2008914 . [2] Sudha Pai and Sajjan Kumar. Everyday Communalism: Riots in Contemporary Uttar Pradesh (OUP, 2018).